Use case · Cash Application

Match every remittance, clear every open item.

Agents read remittance advices from every format and channel, match payments to open invoices, and flag short-pays and unapplied cash for review with the evidence attached.

An incoming remittance converted into a structured finance work item

Where value leaks

Unapplied cash hides real problems behind a clearing account.

Remittance formats vary by customer and channel, so matching stalls and payments sit unapplied. Every unapplied dollar is a disguised deduction, pricing error, or short-pay waiting to be found.

2–5%

of incoming payments require manual matching without automation

Days

that unapplied cash typically sits before anyone investigates it

100%

of remittances matched against open invoices, not a sample

Proof

Matching every remittance changes what cash application can see.

$50K

duplicate invoice surfaced

A US craft brewery · Cloudsquid customer result

$730K

in errors surfaced

A construction wholesaler · 90% less manual reconciliation · Cloudsquid customer result

< 2 hours

to audit a full year of AP

100% transaction coverage · Cloudsquid customer result

Use cases

Start with the work your team never gets through.

01

Remittance matching

02

Unapplied cash investigation

03

Short-pay classification

04

Duplicate payment detection

Which process would you hand over first?